Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588793›Full record

ArticleBJA open2022

Association of menstrual cycle and postoperative quality of recovery in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study.

Nicole L T Tan, Sze Wey Lee, Sophie Zaloumis, Karen E Lamb, Dianne Dawson, Helena J Teede, Paul S Myles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L T TanCritical Care Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Sze Wey LeeWomen's and Children's Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Sophie ZaloumisCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Karen E LambCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Dianne DawsonResearch Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul S MylesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Epworth Hospital · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women have poorer quality of postoperative recovery from general anaesthesia than men. This persists for at least 3 days postoperatively, and is more pronounced in premenopausal women. Studies of menstrual cycle effects on pain or postoperative nausea and vomiting report conflicting results. Our aim was to determine whether menstrual cycle phase is associated with quality of recovery after surgery in premenopausal women. Methods: Eligible women aged 18-45 yr undergoing wisdom teeth extraction or laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia with volatile agents were recruited from Epworth HealthCare Richmond in Melbourne, Australia from 2019 to 2021. Menstrual history and progesterone levels were used to determine cycle phase (luteal or non-luteal). Linear mixed and generalised linear regression models were fitted to examine differences in Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on postoperative days 1 (primary outcome) and 3, and secondary outcomes (pain, analgesic effectiveness, postoperative nausea and vomiting, prolonged hospital admission), between groups, adjusting for confounders. Results: A total of 177 women were recruited (74 luteal, 103 non-luteal). Six (3%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Estimated mean differences (95% confidence interval; Conclusions: There was no significant difference in postoperative QoR-15 score or other outcomes between women in the luteal and non-luteal phases of their cycle. Women can be reassured that cycle phase does not impact postoperative quality of recovery when undergoing minor surgery under general anaesthesia. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12618000240246.

Indexed as

hormonal cyclemenstrual cyclepostoperative nauseapostoperative painpostoperative recoverypremenopausalquality of recovery

Identifiers

PMID37588793
PMCPMC10430848
OpenAlexW4307698986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.