Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588780›Full record

ReviewBJA open2022

High-flow nasal oxygenation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Michele Carron, Enrico Tamburini, Bijan Safaee Fakhr, Alessandro De Cassai, Federico Linassi, Paolo Navalesi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06689033 (Comparison of High Flow Nasal Oxygen and Standard Nasal Oxygen in Preventing Hypoxia in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Under Sedation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06689033 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of High Flow Nasal Oxygen and Standard Nasal Oxygen in Preventing Hypoxia in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Under Sedation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2023 to 2023Enrolled187ConditionsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Hypoxia, Sedation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele CarronDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Enrico TamburiniDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Bijan Safaee FakhrDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro De CassaiInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padua, Italy.
Federico LinassiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ca' Foncello Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazzale Ospedale 1,Treviso, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has the potential to improve patient safety by limiting hypoxaemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy. The degree of benefit is not adequately established. Methods: English language literature searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were performed to identify randomised controlled trials comparing HFNO and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) for patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxic events observed during endoscopic procedures. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of recourse to rescue manoeuvres, procedure interruption, and adverse events. A meta-analysis and a Results: A total of 2867 patients from six randomised controlled trials were considered. Desaturation was observed in 5.2% and 27.2% of patients receiving HFNO and COT, respectively. Desaturation <90% was observed in 1.8% and 12.6% of the patients receiving HFNO and COT, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, desaturation occurrence was lower during HFNO than during COT in non-obese patients (2.2% Conclusions: The evidence reviewed suggests that compared with COT, HFNO has fewer hypoxaemic events during gastrointestinal endoscopy, but this may not apply to all patients and clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

complicationsdigestive system endoscopygastrointestinal endoscopyhypoxiaoxygen inhalation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37588780
PMCPMC10430836
OpenAlexW4306666912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.