ArticleBJA open2022
Safety of sugammadex for myasthaenia gravis patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a retrospective database study.
Article in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Using neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) for patients with myasthaenia gravis remains a challenge in perioperative management. Sugammadex has enabled the safe use of NMBDs. We investigated whether the adverse outcomes, and the treatment used for myasthaenic crises and tracheotomy, are affected by NMBD use in patients with myasthaenia gravis under general anaesthesia. Methods: Patients with myasthaenia gravis who underwent general anaesthesia were retrieved from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination/Per-Diem Payment systems in Japan between 1 January 2010 and 30 November 2020. This database did not contain information on the severity of myasthaenia gravis (Osserman classification). Patients who received rocuronium and sugammadex were compared with those who did not receive NMBDs after propensity-score matching. We excluded patients who underwent emergency or cardiac surgery or tracheal intubation before anaesthesia. The primary outcome was receipt of postoperative treatment used for myasthaenic crises. Results: Among 2304 surgical patients with comorbid myasthaenia gravis, propensity-score matching identified 788 patients administered rocuronium and sugammadex and 449 not administered NMBDs. On comparing the treatment used for myasthaenic crises, we found no significant difference between the two groups (6.2% Conclusions: Use of rocuronium and sugammadex in patients with myasthaenia gravis did not significantly affect the receipt of postoperative treatment used for myasthaenic crises compared with no use of NMBDs. As well as the severity of myasthaenia gravis was not fully adjusted, it is unclear whether intraoperative administration of rocuronium with the use of sugammadex postoperatively is acceptable and further investigations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.