Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588768›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental modelling & software : with environment data news2022

Inter-model comparison of simulated Gulf of Mexico hypoxia in response to reduced nutrient loads: effects of phytoplankton and organic matter parameterization.

Brandon M Jarvis, James J Pauer, Wilson Melendez, Yongshan Wan, John C Lehrter, Lisa L Lowe, Cody W Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brandon M JarvisUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.
James J PauerUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2000 Traverwood Dr. #C59, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Wilson MelendezGeneral Dynamics Information Technology, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, MN, 55804, USA.
Yongshan WanUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.
John C LehrterUniversity of South Alabama and Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL, 36528, USA.
Lisa L LoweNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Cody W SimmonsGeneral Dynamics Information Technology, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex simulation models are a valuable tool to inform nutrient management decisions aimed at reducing hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico, yet simulated hypoxia response to reduced nutrients varies greatly between models. We compared two biogeochemical models driven by the same hydrodynamics, the Coastal Generalized Ecosystem Model (CGEM) and Gulf of Mexico Dissolved Oxygen Model (GoMDOM), to investigate how they differ in simulating hypoxia and their response to reduced nutrients. Different phytoplankton nutrient kinetics produced 2-3 times more hypoxic area and volume on the western shelf in CGEM compared to GoMDOM. Reductions in hypoxic area were greatest in the western shelf, comprising 72% (~4,200 km

Indexed as

Gulf of MexicohypoxiaInter-model comparisonnutrient load reductionprimary production and respiration

Identifiers

PMID37588768
PMCPMC10428225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.