Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588667›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

A decentralized, prospective, observational study to collect real-world data from patients with myasthenia gravis using smartphones.

Sandra Steyaert, Meelis Lootus, Chethan Sarabu, Zeenia Framroze, Harriet Dickinson, Emily Lewis, Jean-Christophe Steels, Francesca Rinaldo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04590716 (A Digital Health Trial That Assesses Participant-driven Data Collection Using Smartphone Modules to Characterize Myasthenia Gravis Symptoms and Develop an A.I. Model to Predict Flares), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04590716 completednot on this map

A Digital Health Trial That Assesses Participant-driven Data Collection Using Smartphone Modules to Characterize Myasthenia Gravis Symptoms and Develop an A.I. Model to Predict Flares

TypeobservationalSponsordoc.ai incRan2020 to 2021Enrolled113ConditionsMyasthenia GravisArmsData Collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Remote Monitoring in Myasthenia Gravis: Exploring Symptom Variability.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandra SteyaertSharecare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States.
Meelis LootusSharecare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States.
Chethan SarabuSharecare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States.
Zeenia FramrozeSharecare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States.
Harriet DickinsonGlobal Real World Evidence, UCB Slough, Slough, United Kingdom.
Emily LewisUCB S.A. (Headquarters) Allée de la Recherche, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Christophe SteelsUCB S.A. (Headquarters) Allée de la Recherche, Brussels, Belgium.
Francesca RinaldoSharecare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a 3-month, prospective study in a population of patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG), utilizing a fully decentralized approach for recruitment and monitoring (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04590716). The study objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting real-world data through a smartphone-based research platform, in order to characterize symptom involvement during MG exacerbations. Methods: Primary data collection included daily electronically recorded patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) on the presence of MG symptoms, the level of symptom severity (using the MG-Activities of Daily Living assessment, MG-ADL), and exacerbation status. Participants were also given the option to contribute data on their physical activity levels from their own wearable devices. Results: The study enrolled and onboarded 113 participants across 37 US states, and 73% (N= 82) completed the study. The mean age of participants was 53.6 years, 60% were female. Participants were representative of a moderate to severe MG phenotype, with frequent exacerbations, high symptom burden and multiple comorbidities. 55% of participants (N=45) reported MG exacerbations during the study, with an average of 6.3 exacerbation days per participant. Median average MG-ADL scores for participants during self-reported exacerbation and non-exacerbation periods were 7 (interquartile range 4-9, range 1-19) and 0.3 (interquartile range 0-0.8, range 0-9), respectively. Analyses examining relationships between patient-reported and patient-generated health data streams and exacerbation status demonstrated concordance between self-reported MG-ADL scores and exacerbation status, and identified features that may be used to understand and predict the onset of MG symptom exacerbations, including: 1.) dynamic changes in day-to-day symptom reporting and severity 2.) daily step counts as a measure of physical activity and 3.) clinical characteristics of the patient, including the amount of time since their initial diagnosis and their active medications related to MG treatment. Finally, application of unsupervised machine learning methods identified unique clusters of exacerbation subtypes, each with their own specific representation of symptoms and symptom severity. Conclusion: While these symptom signatures require further study and validation, our results suggest that digital phenotyping, characterized by increased multidimensionality and frequency of the data collection, holds promise for furthering our understanding of clinically significant exacerbations and reimagining the approach to treating MG as a heterogeneous condition.

Indexed as

decentralizedexacerbationsmyasthenia gravisobservational studysmartphone-based data collection

Identifiers

PMID37588667
PMCPMC10427188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.