ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2023
Quantitative and Qualitative Representation of Introductory and Advanced EEG Concepts: An Exploration of Different EEG Setups.
Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Point-of-Care EEG for Non-Convulsive Seizure and Status Epilepticus: Advances, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalograms (EEGs) are the gold standard test used in the medical field to diagnose epilepsy and aid in the diagnosis of many other neurological and mental disorders. Growing in popularity in terms of nonmedical applications, the EEG is also used in research, neurofeedback, and brain-computer interface, making it increasingly relevant to student learning. Recent innovations have made EEG setups more accessible and affordable, thus allowing their integration into neuroscience educational settings. Introducing students to EEGs, however, can be daunting due to intricate setup protocols, individual variation, and potentially expensive equipment. This paper aims to provide guidance for introducing students and educators to fundamental beginning and advanced level EEG concepts. Specifically, this paper tested the potential of three different setups, with varying channel number and wired or wireless connectivity, for introducing students to qualitative and quantitative exploration of alpha enhancement when eyes are closed, and observation of the alpha/beta anterior to posterior gradient. The setups were compared to determine their relative advantages and their robustness in detecting these well-established parameters. The basic 1- or 2-channel setups are sufficient for observing alpha and beta waves, while more advanced systems containing 8 or 16 channels are required for consistent observation of an anterior-posterior gradient. In terms of localization, the 16-channel setup, in principle, was more adept. The 8-channel setup, however, was more effective than the 16-channel setup with regards to displaying the anterior to posterior gradient. Thus, an 8-channel setup is sufficient in an education setting to display these known trends. Modification of the 16-channel setup may provide a better observation of the anterior to posterior gradient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.