Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588651›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2023

Quantitative and Qualitative Representation of Introductory and Advanced EEG Concepts: An Exploration of Different EEG Setups.

Shelby L Hatton, Shubham Rathore, Ilya Vilinsky, Annette Stowasser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shelby L HattonUndergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Shubham RathoreBiology Department, University Of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Ilya VilinskyUndergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Annette StowasserUndergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalograms (EEGs) are the gold standard test used in the medical field to diagnose epilepsy and aid in the diagnosis of many other neurological and mental disorders. Growing in popularity in terms of nonmedical applications, the EEG is also used in research, neurofeedback, and brain-computer interface, making it increasingly relevant to student learning. Recent innovations have made EEG setups more accessible and affordable, thus allowing their integration into neuroscience educational settings. Introducing students to EEGs, however, can be daunting due to intricate setup protocols, individual variation, and potentially expensive equipment. This paper aims to provide guidance for introducing students and educators to fundamental beginning and advanced level EEG concepts. Specifically, this paper tested the potential of three different setups, with varying channel number and wired or wireless connectivity, for introducing students to qualitative and quantitative exploration of alpha enhancement when eyes are closed, and observation of the alpha/beta anterior to posterior gradient. The setups were compared to determine their relative advantages and their robustness in detecting these well-established parameters. The basic 1- or 2-channel setups are sufficient for observing alpha and beta waves, while more advanced systems containing 8 or 16 channels are required for consistent observation of an anterior-posterior gradient. In terms of localization, the 16-channel setup, in principle, was more adept. The 8-channel setup, however, was more effective than the 16-channel setup with regards to displaying the anterior to posterior gradient. Thus, an 8-channel setup is sufficient in an education setting to display these known trends. Modification of the 16-channel setup may provide a better observation of the anterior to posterior gradient.

Indexed as

Alpha:Beta Power RatioElectroencephalogram (EEG)Eyes-Closed TestPower Spectrum Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37588651
PMCPMC10426816
OpenAlexW4385742301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.