ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Predicting sepsis using deep learning across international sites: a retrospective development and validation study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Based Sepsis Prediction in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review, Subgroup Meta-Analysis, and Contextual Analysis of Clinical Burden.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Sepsis Prediction in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- External validation of AI-based scoring systems in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large language models are powerful electronic health record encoders.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Real-Time Artificial Intelligence for Early Sepsis Prediction Using Dynamic Clinical Data: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Service-Specific Heterogeneity in Sepsis Variable Significance and Machine Learning Model Performance: A Stratified Analysis of the BIAlert Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-source data integration through pooling and transfer learning improves generalizability and specialization of deep learning models for ICU mortality and length of stay prediction: a four-database external validation study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Early sepsis prediction using a hybrid LSTM-GAT model: a study on the PhysioNet 2019 dataset.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Blood pressure response index trajectories identify distinct hemodynamic phenotypes and predict mortality in septic shock: a two-database retrospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- It Is Time to Move Beyond Task-Specific Critical Care Prediction Models and Prioritize a Foundation Model Built on Continuous Physiological Data.Critical care medicine · 2026Article
- The Impact of Evaluation Strategy on Sepsis Prediction Model Performance Metrics in Intensive Care Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Evaluating deep learning sepsis prediction models in ICUs under distribution shift: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-powered learning health system to improve sepsis detection and quality of care: a before-and-after study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting Pediatric Sepsis and Mortality Using Wearable Device Data and Machine Learning in Bangladesh.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Observational
- Extraction and processing of intensive care chart data from a patient data management system.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When sepsis is detected, organ damage may have progressed to irreversible stages, leading to poor prognosis. The use of machine learning for predicting sepsis early has shown promise, however international validations are missing. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, multi-centre cohort study. We developed and externally validated a deep learning system for the prediction of sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our analysis represents the first international, multi-centre in-ICU cohort study for sepsis prediction using deep learning to our knowledge. Our dataset contains 136,478 unique ICU admissions, representing a refined and harmonised subset of four large ICU databases comprising data collected from ICUs in the US, the Netherlands, and Switzerland between 2001 and 2016. Using the international consensus definition Sepsis-3, we derived hourly-resolved sepsis annotations, amounting to 25,694 (18.8%) patient stays with sepsis. We compared our approach to clinical baselines as well as machine learning baselines and performed an extensive internal and external statistical validation within and across databases, reporting area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Findings: Averaged over sites, our model was able to predict sepsis with an AUC of 0.846 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.841-0.852) on a held-out validation cohort internal to each site, and an AUC of 0.761 (95% CI, 0.746-0.770) when validating externally across sites. Given access to a small fine-tuning set (10% per site), the transfer to target sites was improved to an AUC of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.801-0.813). Our model raised 1.4 false alerts per true alert and detected 80% of the septic patients 3.7 h (95% CI, 3.0-4.3) prior to the onset of sepsis, opening a vital window for intervention. Interpretation: By monitoring clinical and laboratory measurements in a retrospective simulation of a real-time prediction scenario, a deep learning system for the detection of sepsis generalised to previously unseen ICU cohorts, internationally. Funding: This study was funded by the Personalized Health and Related Technologies (PHRT) strategic focus area of the ETH domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.