Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588617›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

A dataset for predicting Supreme Court judgments in Nigeria.

O C Ngige, F Y Ayankoya, J A Balogun, E Onuiri, C Agbonkhese, F A Sanusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

O C NgigeFederal Institute of Industrial Research, Oshodi, Nigeria.
F Y AyankoyaDepartment of Computer Science, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
J A BalogunDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Mountain Top University, Nigeria.
E OnuiriDepartment of Computer Science, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
C AgbonkheseDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Mountain Top University, Nigeria.
F A SanusiDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Mountain Top University, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been widely argued among researchers that the application of big data analytics promises to reduce human bias and provide a scientific and evidence-based approach to the judicial process. In this dataset, historical data consisting of appeal cases presented at the Supreme Court of Nigeria (SCN) were collected from an online repository (Primsol Law Pavillion). A total of 5585 appeal cases brought before the SCN were collected from the archive. The dataset consisted of both criminal and civil appeal cases brought before the SCN. Variables that are related to court case proceedings were identified from related literature, verified by legal experts and used as a basis for generating an electronic structured version of the dataset stored as a spreadsheet file from the unstructured data. From the collected data, thirteen input variables were identified with one output/decision variable. The distribution of the numerical variables was presented as a descriptive statistical summary in terms of the minimum, maximum, mode, mean and standard deviation. The developed dataset can assist researchers to build predictive systems by training their models. Various feature extraction techniques can also be applied on the dataset to remove irrelevant or redundant features for increased performance of such classifiers that are needed to predict the outcome of legal cases.

Indexed as

Classification algorithmsFeature extractionJustice systemSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37588617
PMCPMC10425661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.