Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588584›Full record

ArticleBJA open2022

Patient-Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI 1) - A feasibility trial.

Stefanie Seifert, Knut Taxbro, Fredrik Hammarskjöld

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04631393 (Patient-controlled Sedation in Port Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04631393 completednot on this map

Patient-controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-1)-a Feasibility Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorStefanie SeifertRan2021 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsPain, Patient SatisfactionArmsPropofol Alfentanil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie SeifertDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Knut TaxbroDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Fredrik HammarskjöldDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SERyhov Hospital Jönköping · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central venous access is essential for the administration of chemotherapy and frequent blood sampling in patients with cancer. The subcutaneous venous port is commonly used for this purpose. Subcutaneous venous port implantation is a minor surgical procedure; however, it can provoke pain and anxiety in these vulnerable patients. The aim of this study was, before a full-scale RCT, to determine the feasibility of patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil as an adjunct to local anaesthesia during SVP implantation. Methods: We prospectively studied 40 patients scheduled for SVP implantation between 14 April 2021 and 15 October 2021 at a 500-bed secondary level hospital in Sweden. Anaesthesiologists performed subcutaneous venous port implantation with patient-controlled sedation using propofol and alfentanil. We determined pain perception (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, sedation score, and key safety measures. Results: Of the 40 patients with cancer, 80% reported a pain score ≤3 on an 11-point numeric rating scale during subcutaneous venous port implantation. Overall satisfaction with pain management and operating conditions was graded as 10 of 10 on the numeric rating scale. Four patients (10%) had bradypnoea (<8 bpm) without oxygen desaturation to ≤90%. Rescue sedation was administered to one patient (2.5%). Conclusion: Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil during subcutaneous venous port implantation is feasible and well accepted. Ultimately the efficacy of patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil needs to be evaluated in an RCT to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for choosing the optimal perioperative strategy for subcutaneous venous port implantation. Clinical trial registration: NCT04631393.

Indexed as

feasibility studypatient-controlled sedationpatient satisfactionpropofolsubcutaneous venous port

Identifiers

PMID37588584
PMCPMC10430819
OpenAlexW4289048679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.