ArticleBJA open2022
Impact of fasting on the gastric volume of critically ill patients before extubation: a prospective observational study using gastric ultrasound.
Article in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Fasting Prior to Extubation on Prevalence of Empty Stomach in Enterally Fed and Mechanically Ventilated Patients.Respiratory care · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A period of fasting before tracheal extubation of ventilated patients in the ICU is common practice, aiming to reduce gastric volume and aspiration risk. As the volume of gastric content is unknown at the time of extubation, the efficacy of this practice is uncertain. Methods: A prospective, observational study using gastric ultrasound was undertaken. Images were obtained at four time points: (i) at baseline, with gastric feeds running; (ii) after suctioning of gastric contents through a gastric tube; (iii) after a 4 h period with no gastric feed running; and (iv) after both a 4 h fasting period and gastric tube suctioning. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients classed as low risk of aspiration with each intervention, using qualitative and quantitative gastric ultrasound. Results: Fifty-four patients in the ICU were enrolled. Forty-four (81%) subjects had images that were suitable for analysis. Suctioning of stomach content through a gastric tube and fasting were equivalent with 39/44 (88.6%) and 5/44 (11.4%) subjects classified as low risk and at risk of aspiration, respectively. A period of fasting followed by suction resulted in 41/44 (93.2%) patients being at low risk. Conclusions: Suctioning of stomach contents through the gastric tube and a 4 h fasting period appear equivalent at reducing gastric volume below a safe threshold. A small percentage did not reach the threshold despite all interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.