Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588565›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2021

Relatedness within and between Agta residential groups.

Mark Dyble, Andrea Bamberg Migliano, Abigail E Page, Daniel Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Kinship Formula: Inferring the numbers of all kin from any structured population projection model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Editorial - Déjà vu all over again.Evolutionary human sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Explaining variation in the kinship composition of mammal groups.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark DybleDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-1631
Andrea Bamberg MiglianoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abigail E PageDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-1569
Daniel SmithBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-2023

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014216/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical models relating to the evolution of human behaviour usually make assumptions about the kinship structure of social groups. Since humans were hunter-gatherers for most of our evolutionary history, data on the composition of contemporary hunter-gatherer groups has long been used to inform these models. Although several papers have taken a broad view of hunter-gatherer social organisation, it is also useful to explore data from single populations in more depth. Here, we describe patterns of relatedness among the Palanan Agta, hunter-gatherers from the northern Philippines. Across 271 adults, mean relatedness to adults across the population is

Indexed as

affinal kinAgtahunter–gathererskinship dynamicsrelatednesssocial organisation

Identifiers

PMID37588565
PMCPMC10427306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.