Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588550›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2021

The shortlist effect: nestedness contributions as a tool to explain cultural success.

Olivier Morin, Oleg Sobchuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editorial - Déjà vu all over again.Evolutionary human sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier MorinMinds and Traditions Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 10, Kahlaische strasse, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6216-1307
Oleg SobchukMinds and Traditions Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 10, Kahlaische strasse, 07745 Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting the forces behind the success or failure of cultural products, such as books or films, remains a challenge. Three such forces are drift, context-biased selection and selection based on content - when things succeed because of their intrinsic appeal. We propose a tool to study content-biased selection in sets of cultural collections - e.g. libraries or movie collections - based on the 'shortlist effect': the fact that smaller collections are more selective and more likely to favour highly appealing items over others. We use a model to show that, when the shortlist effect is at work, content-biased cultural selection is associated with greater nestedness in sets of collections. Having established empirically the existence of the shortlist effect, and of content-biased selection, in 28 sets of movie collections, we show that nestedness contributions can be used to estimate to what extent specific movies owe their success to their intrinsic properties. This method can be used in a wide range of datasets to detect the items that owe their success to their intrinsic appeal, as opposed to 'hidden gems' or 'accidental hits'.

Indexed as

content-biased selectioncultural driftcultural evolutionCultural nestednesscultural selectionmoviesnestedness contribution

Identifiers

PMID37588550
PMCPMC10427280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.