Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588423›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

One health adoption within prevention, preparedness and response to health threats: Highlights from a scoping review.

Claudia Robbiati, Alessia Milano, Silvia Declich, Kevin Di Domenico, Laura Mancini, Scilla Pizzarelli, Franca D'Angelo, Flavia Riccardo, Gaia Scavia, Maria Grazia Dente

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Perceived Harm to Pet Health Associated with Human Quality of Life After a Public Health Disaster.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudia RobbiatiIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), National Center for Global Health, Rome, Italy.
Alessia MilanoIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), National Center for Global Health, Rome, Italy.
Silvia DeclichIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), National Center for Global Health, Rome, Italy.
Kevin Di DomenicoPublic Health and Infectious Diseases Dept., Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Laura ManciniIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Environment and Health Dept., Rome, Italy.
Scilla PizzarelliIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Knowledge Unit (Documentation, Library), Rome, Italy.
Franca D'AngeloIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), National Center for Global Health, Rome, Italy.
Flavia RiccardoIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Infectious Diseases Dept., Rome, Italy.
Gaia ScaviaIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health Dept., Rome, Italy.
Maria Grazia DenteIstituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), National Center for Global Health, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, the complexity of factors involved in the emergence of health threats requires a holistic One Health (OH) approach to enhance the effectiveness of prevention, preparedness, and response (PPR) strategies. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to explore how the OH approach has been adopted in the context of PPR strategies to health threats, and the challenges and benefits deriving from its integration. Methods: We defined the research questions and a strategy to guide the peer-reviewed and grey literature search to identify relevant articles and documents (identification). We assessed them for eligibility according to predefined criteria (screening) and finally included the ones that answered the research questions (inclusion). We performed a descriptive and thematic analysis of the results. Results: A total of 138 records were included in the review (57 from the peer-reviewed literature and 81 from the grey literature). The OH approach was mainly adopted in prevention strategies, particularly within the governance area. Human and animal health were the most integrated disciplines in the OH approach, while environmental and social sciences were the less integrated. The most targeted threats were antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses, with the African region being the most represented. Conducive factors for the adoption of OH PPR strategies were identified in resolutions and guidance emanating from international organisations. Discussion: The global governance of OH should utilise conducive factors, such as international resolutions and guidance, to enhance the adoption of multisectoral and multi-actor PPR strategies, that focus on national and international priorities and neglected threats, such as environmental hazards and pandemic risk. Integrated frameworks and metrics for the implementation and evaluation of OH PPR strategies need to be consolidated to contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the adoption of the OH approach.

Indexed as

One HealthPreparednessPreventionResponse

Identifiers

PMID37588423
PMCPMC10425384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.