Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588399›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2019

Unknotting the interactive effects of learning processes on cultural evolutionary dynamics.

Lauren A Scanlon, Andrew Lobb, Jamshid J Tehrani, Jeremy R Kendal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Human biases limit cumulative innovation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren A ScanlonDepartment Of Mathematics, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Andrew LobbDepartment Of Mathematics, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Jamshid J TehraniDepartment Of Anthropology And Durham Cultural Evolution Research Centre, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Jeremy R KendalDepartment Of Anthropology And Durham Cultural Evolution Research Centre, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8644-3117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forms of non-random copying error provide sources of inherited variation yet their effects on cultural evolutionary dynamics are poorly understood. Focusing on variation in granny and reef knot forms, we present a mathematical model that specifies how these variant frequencies are affected by non-linear interactions between copying fidelity, mirroring, handedness and repetition biases. Experiments on adult humans allowed these effects to be estimated using approximate Bayesian computation and the model is iterated to explain the prevalence of granny over reef knots in the wild. Our study system also serves to show conditions under which copying fidelity drives heterogeneity in cultural variants at equilibrium, and that interaction between unbiased forms of copying error can skew cultural variation.

Indexed as

Approximate Bayesian computationcopying errorcultural evolutionknotssocial learning

Identifiers

PMID37588399
PMCPMC10427294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.