ReviewCureus2023
Therapeutic Potential of Vitamin D in Management of Asthma: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The therapeutic potential of vitamin D supplementation in asthma.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Investigation of the Molecular Mechanism of Asthma in Meishan Pigs Using Multi-Omics Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Vitamin D deficiency and asthma morbidity in school-age children: a single-center cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Predicting Asthma Exacerbations Using Machine Learning Models.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Look at the Development of Asthma in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dietary intake, antioxidants, minerals and vitamins in relation to childhood asthma: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma, a prevalent chronic respiratory illness, affects a substantial number of individuals worldwide, with an estimated occurrence of 358 million cases. Evidence for the benefits of vitamin D in treating asthma is ambiguous and contradictory. The goal of this review article is to emphasize the value of vitamin D supplementation for people with asthma. Medical subject headings (MeSH) terminology was used to search the PubMed Central, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases for articles on vitamin D supplementation in asthma patients. We selected a comprehensive range of academic writing examples published in English, encompassing various types of texts. The study included a total of 37 papers, of which 18 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five were meta-analyses. The use of a corticosteroid, with or without the inclusion of an adrenergic receptor agonist, improves the disease's symptoms, but it is unable to halt the long-term decline in lung function. Over the past 20 years, vitamin D has developed into a potent immunomodulator, influencing both immunological and structural cells, most notably airway smooth muscle cells. Among adults with low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, the administration of vitamin D supplements was found to have positive effects in a reduction in the likelihood of asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. The provision of vitamin D supplements during pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of asthma in babies. Both children and adults with inadequate vitamin D levels who have been given vitamin D supplements have shown evident preventive effects against asthma. Therefore, we conclude there should be a lower threshold for prescribing vitamin D to patients with asthma who are vitamin D deficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.