ArticleBJA open2022
Effect of sevoflurane
Article in BJA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative changes of the linguistic functions in women after gynecological laparoscopic operations under propofol or sevoflurane-based anesthesia.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Trial
- Propofol-based versus volatile anesthesia and postoperative immune response in prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sevoflurane and propofol are commonly used drugs in general anaesthesia. However, their effects on perioperative immune function are incompletely understood. We hypothesised that sevoflurane and propofol differentially affect immune function in healthy individuals. Therefore, we investigated the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio before, during, and after general anaesthesia. Methods: In this randomised crossover study, 19 healthy individuals underwent 2 h of general anaesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane. After 4 weeks, anaesthesia was repeated using the other drug. Blood samples were obtained before, during, 1 h after, and 1 day after anaesthesia. The primary outcome was whole-blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and secondary outcomes were specific white blood cell differential counts. A linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate effect sizes. Results: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher in the propofol compared with the sevoflurane group during anaesthesia, 2.8 (confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-3.3) Conclusions: In healthy individuals undergoing general anaesthesia without surgery, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was affected by the type of hypnotic used. Transient lymphopaenia was observed in all participants during propofol anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.