Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37588253›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2023

Impact of Introducing a PACU24 Concept on the Perioperative Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery.

Susanne Reuter, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Sebastian A Haas, Antonia Zapf, Sinan Cevirme, Katharina Prieske, Linn Wölber, Volkmar Müller, Christian Zöllner, Anna Jaeger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne ReuterKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian A HaasKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Antonia ZapfInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sinan CevirmeInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina PrieskeKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Linn WölberKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian ZöllnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna JaegerKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with ovarian cancer who undergo multivisceral surgery usually require intensive care monitoring postoperatively. In view of the ever-fewer numbers of high-care/intensive care beds and the introduction of fast-track treatment concepts, it is increasingly being suggested that these patients should be cared for postoperatively in 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Units (PACU24). No analyses have been carried out to date to investigate whether such a postoperative care concept might be associated with a potential increase in postoperative complications in this patient cohort. Methods: A PACU24 unit was set up in our institution in 2015 and it has become the primary postoperative care pathway for patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone cytoreductive (debulking) surgery. A structured, retrospective analysis of data from patients treated before (control group) and Results: The data of 42 patients were analyzed for the PACU group and 45 patients for the control group. According to the analysis, the preoperative and surgical data of both groups were comparable (age, ASA, BMI, FIGO stage, duration of surgery, blood loss). The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score) as a measure for the risk of postoperative complications was higher in the PACU group (11.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the PACU group underwent bowel resection with anastomosis significantly more often (76.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), although the extent of surgery was otherwise comparable. The total number, type and severity of postoperative complications and the duration of the overall stay in hospital did not differ between the two groups. None of the patients required secondary transfer from the PACU or normal ward to an intensive care unit (ICU). Summary: Our data support the assumption that the care concept of transferring patients to a PACU24 represents a safe and cost-saving care pathway for the postoperative care of patients even after complex gynecological-oncological procedures.

Indexed as

cytoreductive surgeryfast tracklength of hospital stay (LOS)ovarian cancerPost-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24)

Identifiers

PMID37588253
PMCPMC10427201
OpenAlexW4379185048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.