ArticleBJA open2023
Continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow during general anaesthesia in infants.
Article in BJA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative transfontanelle ultrasonography for pediatric patients.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024Article
- Instant Detection of Cerebral Blood Flow Changes in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease during Transcatheter Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Continuous cerebral blood flow monitoring: What should we do with these extra numbers?BJA open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General anaesthesia is associated with neurocognitive deficits in infants after noncardiac surgery. Disturbances in cerebral perfusion as a result of systemic hypotension and impaired autoregulation may be a potential cause. Our aim was to study cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity continuously during general anaesthesia in infants undergoing noncardiac surgery and compare variations in CBF velocity with simultaneously measured near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), blood pressure, and heart rate. Methods: NeoDoppler, a recently developed ultrasound system, was used to monitor CBF velocity via the anterior fontanelle during induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia until the start of surgery, and during recovery. NIRS, blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored simultaneously and synchronised with the NeoDoppler measurements. Results: Thirty infants, with a median postmenstrual age at surgery of 37.6 weeks (range 28.6-60.0) were included. Compared with baseline, the trend curves showed a decrease in CBF velocity during induction and maintenance of anaesthesia and returned to baseline values during recovery. End-diastolic velocity decreased in all infants during anaesthesia, on average by 59%, whereas peak systolic- and time-averaged velocities decreased by 26% and 45%, respectively. In comparison, the reduction in mean arterial pressure was only 20%. NIRS values were high and remained stable. When adjusting for mean arterial pressure, the significant decrease in end-diastolic velocity persisted, whereas there was only a small reduction in peak systolic velocity. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring of CBF velocity using NeoDoppler during anaesthesia is feasible and may provide valuable information about cerebral perfusion contributing to a more targeted haemodynamic management in anaesthetised infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.