ReviewComplex psychiatry
Integrative Post-Genome-Wide Association Study Analyses Relevant to Psychiatric Disorders: Imputing Transcriptome and Proteome Signals.
Review in Complex psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a common tool to identify genetic variants associated with complex traits, including psychiatric disorders (PDs). However, post-GWAS analyses are needed to extend the statistical inference to biologically relevant entities, e.g., genes, proteins, and pathways. To achieve this goal, researchers developed methods that incorporate biologically relevant intermediate molecular phenotypes, such as gene expression and protein abundance, which are posited to mediate the variant-trait association. Transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) and proteome-wide association study (PWAS) are commonly used methods to test the association between these molecular mediators and the trait. Summary: In this review, we discuss the most recent developments in TWAS and PWAS. These methods integrate existing "omic" information with the GWAS summary statistics for trait(s) of interest. Specifically, they impute transcript/protein data and test the association between imputed gene expression/protein level with phenotype of interest by using (i) GWAS summary statistics and (ii) reference transcriptomic/proteomic/genomic datasets. TWAS and PWAS are suitable as analysis tools for (i) primary association scan and (ii) fine-mapping to identify potentially causal genes for PDs. Key Messages: As post-GWAS analyses, TWAS and PWAS have the potential to highlight causal genes for PDs. These prioritized genes could indicate targets for the development of novel drug therapies. For researchers attempting such analyses, we recommend Mendelian randomization tools that use GWAS statistics for both trait and reference datasets, e.g., summary Mendelian randomization (SMR). We base our recommendation on (i) being able to use the same tool for both TWAS and PWAS, (ii) not requiring the pre-computed weights (and thus easier to update for larger reference datasets), and (iii) most larger transcriptome reference datasets are publicly available and easy to transform into a compatible format for SMR analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.