ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023
Design and fabrication of a custom molded splint for tetraplegics.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The key rehabilitation goal for cervical cord injury is promoting functional hand movement. Patients with mid to low-level cervical spinal cord injury can achieve the useful tenodesis grasp with the assistance of upper extremity orthosis. In this study, a custom molded writing device was fabricated and applied on cervical cord injured patients with the aim of hand rehabilitation. Methods: A total of fourteen individuals with cervical spinal cord injury at C6-C7 level were recruited for the study. They were divided into two groups, where the experimental group was prescribed with the custom molded writing device and the standard-of-care group was prescribed with the traditionally available writing device. The performance of the devices was evaluated using the Quest 2.0 questionnaire and the quality of writing after an intervention time of 4 weeks. Result: The group that used custom molded writing device performed comparatively better when compared to the conventional design. The data showed a significant difference with average QUEST scores of 4.47 ± 0.33 for the group using the wrist-driven writing device and 3.04 ± 0.70 for group using the conventional design. For better understanding of the device's performance, the writing with both the splints was also assessed. Conclusion: A writing device using the tenodesis grasp was fabricated to rehabilitate the writing skills of individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries. The performance of the device provided a favorable result indicating to elaborate the study for future references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.