Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587931›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2023

Market integration, income inequality, and kinship system among the Mosuo of China.

Siobhán M Mattison, Neil MacLaren, Chun-Yi Sum, Peter M Mattison, Ruizhe Liu, Mary K Shenk, Tami Blumenfield, Mingjie Su, Hui Li, Katherine Wander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gender disparities in material and educational resources differ by kinship system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Gendered conflict in the human family.Evolutionary human sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siobhán M MattisonUniversity of New Mexico, Department of Anthropology, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9537-5459
Neil MacLarenState University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Mathematics, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Chun-Yi SumBoston University, Department of General Studies, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter M MattisonUniversity of New Mexico, Department of Biology, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ruizhe LiuUniversity of New Mexico, Department of Anthropology, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Mary K ShenkPennsylvania State University, Department of Anthropology, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-1469
Tami BlumenfieldUniversity of New Mexico, Department of Anthropology, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Mingjie SuFudan University, MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Shanghai, China.
Hui LiFudan University, MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Shanghai, China.
Katherine WanderBinghamton University (SUNY), Department of Anthropology, Binghamton, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased access to defensible material wealth is hypothesised to escalate inequality. Market integration, which creates novel opportunities in cash economies, provides a means of testing this hypothesis. Using demographic data collected from 505 households among the matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo in 2017, we test whether market integration is associated with increased material wealth, whether increased material wealth is associated with wealth inequality, and whether being in a matrilineal vs. patrilineal kinship system alters the relationship between wealth and inequality. We find evidence that market integration, measured as distance to the nearest source of tourism and primary source of household income, is associated with increased household income and 'modern' asset value. Both village-level market integration and mean asset value were associated negatively, rather than positively, with inequality, contrary to predictions. Finally, income, modern wealth and inequality were higher in matrilineal communities that were located closer to the centre of tourism and where tourism has long provided a relatively stable source of income. However, we also observed exacerbated inequality with increasing farm animal value in patriliny. We conclude that the forces affecting wealth and inequality depend on local context and that the importance of local institutions is obscured by aggregate statistics drawn from modern nation states.

Indexed as

communal institutionseconomic developmentmaterial wealthMatrilinypatriliny

Identifiers

PMID37587931
PMCPMC10426023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.