ArticleBrain and behavior2023
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing communication in people with dementia : A scoping review of existing tools.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Review
- Understanding Physician Attitudes Toward AI in Clinical Decision-Making: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Voice analysis results in individuals with Alzheimer's disease: How do age and cognitive status affect voice parameters?Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe communication skills of individuals with dementia are affected even in the early stages of the condition. To date, there is no scale for the evaluation of communication abilities in Turkish-speaking populations with dementia that can be used in clinical practice and research. The present study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale (HCS-TR). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was carried out with 141 participants (77 female and 64 male). Psychometric analyses were conducted to assess the internal consistency, construct and criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability of the HCS-TR. The Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) test was used for criterion validity. For the inter-rater reliability of the scale, the two different caregivers of individuals with dementia were administered the scale separately at the same time. For test-retest reliability, 2 weeks later, the same caregivers who filled out the HCS-TR the first time were administered to fill out the scale again. To test the validity of the scale, an item factor analysis was performed, and the correlations between the items and subsections were determined.
resultsThe factor loadings indicating the adequate contribution of the scale items to the relevant dimension were within the 0.700-0.831 range. There were positive relationships between all the items of the HCS-TR, and there was a significant negative relationship (r = -.842) between HCS-TR and MMSE. The corrected item-total correlation values were found to be within the .676-.794 range. Cronbach's alpha values for the HCS-TR subsection and total scores in the first and second measurements were found to be in the range of .718-.944. There was no statistically significant difference (p = .709) between the mean total scores in the first and second measurements.
conclusionThe HCS-TR is a valid and reliable tool that can be used for clinical and research purposes to assess the strengths and limitations of the communication skills of Turkish individuals with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.