Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587566›Full record

ArticleCommunity health equity research & policy2025

Building Bridges Toward Common Goals - A Call for Greater Collaboration Between Public Health and Integrative, Complementary and Traditional Health Providers.

Margaret D Whitley, Michele Maiers, Daniel F Gallego-Pérez, Bernadette Boden-Albala, Ian D Coulter, Patricia M Herman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community health equity research & policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret D WhitleyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0530-1369
Michele MaiersRAND Center for Collaborative Research in Complementary and Integrative Health, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Daniel F Gallego-PérezProgram on Integrative Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Bernadette Boden-AlbalaDepartment of Health, Society, and Behavior, Program in Public Health, and Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Ian D CoulterRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Patricia M HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

RAND REACH CenterU24AT012549 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI COULTER, IAN DOUGLASS, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2023 to 2025
$6.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT012549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary makes the case for greater collaboration between public health professionals and integrative, complementary and traditional health practitioners (ICTHP). Previous partnerships have been successful, and more such collaborative work is needed to help overcome division, enhance the health workforce, and move all involved toward shared goals. ICTHP providers may be uniquely able to work across ideological differences and engage individuals and communities who are less trusting of public health, including those who are vaccine hesitant. Diverse partnerships can be difficult to maintain, but the application of equitable processes may aid their success. In the face of highly complex public health challenges, partnerships with ICTHP are critical.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesCooperative BehaviorGoalsHealth PersonnelIntegrative MedicinePublic HealthHumanscollaborationcomplementary therapiespublic health practicetraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID37587566
PMCPMC10869632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.