Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587529›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Comparison of microbial detection rates in microbial culture methods versus next-generation sequencing in patients with prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hideo Kato, Mao Hagihara, Nobuhiro Asai, Takumi Umemura, Jun Hirai, Yuka Yamagishi, Takuya Iwamoto, Hiroshige Mikamo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hideo KatoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Mao HagiharaDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Nobuhiro AsaiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Takumi UmemuraDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Jun HiraiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Yuka YamagishiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Takuya IwamotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan.
Hiroshige MikamoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan. mikamo@aichi-med-u.ac.jp.
Aichi Medical University · JPMie University · JPMie University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) enables early and effective treatment. However, there is currently no gold standard test for microbial detection of PJI and traditional synovial fluid culture is relatively insensitive. Recently, it has been reported that sonicating fluid culture and next-generation sequencing (NGS) improve microbial detection rates. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare microbial detection rates in microbial culture methods with and without sonication versus NGS.

methodsWe systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases and other sources (previous reviews) until August 2022. We evaluated the detection rates of pathogens in NGS and microbial cultures using samples of synovial or sonicated fluid.

resultsOf the 170 citations identified for screening, nine studies were included. Pooled analysis indicated that NGS had the highest detection rate among the microbial detection methods (NGS vs. sonicated, odds ratios [OR] 5.09, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.67-15.50; NGS vs. synovial, OR 4.52, 95% CI 2.86-7.16). Sonicated fluid culture showed a higher detection rate than synovial fluid culture (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.23-3.62).

conclusionNGS might be useful as a screening tool for culture-negative patients. In clinical settings, sonicated fluid culture is a practical method for diagnosing PJI.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDatabases, FactualHumansOdds RatioSonicationCultureMeta-analysisNext-generation sequencingProsthetic joint infection

Identifiers

PMID37587529
PMCPMC10428596
OpenAlexW4385874261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.