ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023
Implementation of the trial emulation approach in medical research: a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying, handling and impact of immortal time bias on addressing treatment effects in observational studies using routinely collected data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Conducting observational analyses with the target trial emulation approach: a methodological systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- A Real-World Target Trial Emulation of Eteplirsen, Casimersen, and Golodirsen to Evaluate Survival Among Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with gabapentin versus duloxetine in older adults with neuropathic pain: a target trial emulation cohort study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Timing of high-dose folic acid supplementation in the periconceptional period among women taking antiseizure medications and risk of major congenital anomalies: a target trial emulation.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
- Target trial emulation: bridging observational studies and randomized trials for health decision-making.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in target trial emulation framework: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgical resection reduces one-year mortality, especially in high-risk colon cancer patients: an emulated trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Xiyanping injection for severe pneumonia: a target trial emulation protocol using real-world data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility criteria in emulated target trials.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Effects of Warfarin on the Risks of Mortality, Acute Heart Failure, and Infection Resolution in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Target Trial Emulation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Dynamic effects of COVID-19 vaccination on major acute cardiovascular events and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a target trial emulation study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Incorporating genetic data improves target trial emulations and informs the use of polygenic scores in randomized controlled trial design.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Target Trial Emulation of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic Vaccine for Pre-Exposure Mpox Prevention in At-Risk Populations.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Advancing efficacy prediction for electronic health records based emulated trials in repurposing heart failure therapies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The target trial framework in global health research: barriers and opportunities.Journal of global health · 2025Review
- Invited commentary: target trial emulation-a call for more widespread use.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Target Trial Emulation: Improving the Quality of Observational Studies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using the Principles of Randomized Trials.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Review
- Effect of Early and Delayed Treatment With Remdesivir on Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen conducting randomised controlled trials is impractical, an alternative is to carry out an observational study. However, making valid causal inferences from observational data is challenging because of the risk of several statistical biases. In 2016 Hernán and Robins put forward the 'target trial framework' as a guide to best design and analyse observational studies whilst preventing the most common biases. This framework consists of (1) clearly defining a causal question about an intervention, (2) specifying the protocol of the hypothetical trial, and (3) explaining how the observational data will be used to emulate it.
methodsThe aim of this scoping review was to identify and review all explicit attempts of trial emulation studies across all medical fields. Embase, Medline and Web of Science were searched for trial emulation studies published in English from database inception to February 25, 2021. The following information was extracted from studies that were deemed eligible for review: the subject area, the type of observational data that they leveraged, and the statistical methods they used to address the following biases: (A) confounding bias, (B) immortal time bias, and (C) selection bias.
resultsThe search resulted in 617 studies, 38 of which we deemed eligible for review. Of those 38 studies, most focused on cardiology, infectious diseases or oncology and the majority used electronic health records/electronic medical records data and cohort studies data. Different statistical methods were used to address confounding at baseline and selection bias, predominantly conditioning on the confounders (N = 18/49, 37%) and inverse probability of censoring weighting (N = 7/20, 35%) respectively. Different approaches were used to address immortal time bias, assigning individuals to treatment strategies at start of follow-up based on their data available at that specific time (N = 21, 55%), using the sequential trial emulations approach (N = 11, 29%) or the cloning approach (N = 6, 16%).
conclusionDifferent methods can be leveraged to address (A) confounding bias, (B) immortal time bias, and (C) selection bias. When working with observational data, and if possible, the 'target trial' framework should be used as it provides a structured conceptual approach to observational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.