Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587476›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning.

Michael D Schaller, Marieta Gencheva, Michael R Gunther, Scott A Weed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Introducing Experimental Design Concepts Improves Biochemistry Undergraduates' Experimental Laboratory Competence and Confidence.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael D SchallerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. mschaller@hsc.wvu.edu.
Marieta GenchevaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Michael R GuntherDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Scott A WeedDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Funding

Cell and Molecular Biology Training Program at West Virginia UniversityT32GM133369 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Zoica Cerasela Dinu, MICHAEL D SCHALLER · 2019 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM133369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate training include the utilization of graduate student competencies to assess progress and the introduction of novel curricula focused on development of skills, rather than accumulation of facts. Evidence demonstrates that active learning approaches are effective. Several facets of active learning are components of problem-based learning (PBL), which is a teaching modality where student learning is self-directed toward solving problems in a relevant context. These concepts were combined and incorporated in creating a new introductory graduate course designed to develop scientific skills (student competencies) in matriculating doctoral students using a PBL format.

methodsEvaluation of course effectiveness was measured using the principals of the Kirkpatrick Four Level Model of Evaluation. At the end of each course offering, students completed evaluation surveys on the course and instructors to assess their perceptions of training effectiveness. Pre- and post-tests assessing students' proficiency in experimental design were used to measure student learning.

resultsThe analysis of the outcomes of the course suggests the training is effective in improving experimental design. The course was well received by the students as measured by student evaluations (Kirkpatrick Model Level 1). Improved scores on post-tests indicate that the students learned from the experience (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2). A template is provided for the implementation of similar courses at other institutions.

conclusionsThis problem-based learning course appears effective in training newly matriculated graduate students in the required skills for designing experiments to test specific hypotheses, enhancing student preparation prior to initiation of their dissertation research.

Indexed as

Problem-Based LearningResearch DesignCurriculumHumansStudentsThinkingCritical thinkingDoctoral StudentExperimental designGraduateProblem-based learningTraining

Identifiers

PMID37587476
PMCPMC10428545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.