Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587392›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2023

Capturing Value Attributes in the Economic Evaluation of Ceftazidime with Avibactam for Treating Severe Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the United Kingdom.

Jason Gordon, Maria Gheorghe, Simon Goldenberg, Ryan Miller, James Dennis, Amer Al-Taie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The importance of monitoring a new antibiotic: ceftazidime/avibactam usage and resistance experience from England, 2016 to 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jason GordonHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Unit A, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Copse Walk, Pontprennau, Cardiff, CF23 8RB, UK. jason.gordon@heor.co.uk.
Maria GheorghePfizer SLR, Bucharest, Romania.
Simon GoldenbergCentre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, King's College London and Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0837-7382
Ryan MillerHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Unit A, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Copse Walk, Pontprennau, Cardiff, CF23 8RB, UK.
James DennisHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Unit A, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Copse Walk, Pontprennau, Cardiff, CF23 8RB, UK.
Amer Al-TaiePfizer R&D, Tadworth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6256-6443
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBKing's College London · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial resistance remains a serious and growing threat to public health, both globally and in the UK, leading to diminishing effectiveness of antimicrobials. Despite a clear need for new antimicrobials, the clinical pipeline is insufficient, driven by high research and development costs and limited expected returns on investment. To counteract this, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and National Health Service (NHS) England have launched a reimbursement mechanism, de-linked from volume of sales, that aims to reduce economic risk by recognising the broader population-level value of antimicrobials. The objective of this study was to quantify the value of ceftazidime-avibactam for treating gram-negative infections in the UK considering some of these broader value elements unique to antimicrobials.

methodsA previously developed dynamic disease transmission and cost-effectiveness model was applied to assess the value of introducing ceftazidime-avibactam to UK treatment practice in the management of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections in line with the licenced indications for ceftazidime-avibactam. Model inputs were parameterised using sources aligned to the UK perspective.

resultsThe introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam into a two-line treatment sequence saved over 2300 lives, leading to a gain of 27,600 life years and 22,000 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at an additional cost of £17 million, over a ten-year transmission period. Ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with a net monetary benefit of £642 million at willingness to pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY; even at a lower threshold of £20,000 per QALY, the net monetary benefit is £422 million. DISCUSSION: Increasing the diversity of antimicrobial treatments through the introduction of an additional antimicrobial, in this instance ceftazidime-avibactam, was associated with substantial clinical and economic benefits, when considering broader population-level value. Despite revealing considerable benefits, the value of ceftazidime-avibactam is only partially reflected in this analysis. Further efforts are required to fully operationalise the spectrum, transmission, enablement, diversity and insurance (STEDI) value framework and accurately reflect the population-level value of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

CeftazidimeGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansState MedicineUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidime

Identifiers

PMID37587392
PMCPMC10635959
OpenAlexW4385872116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.