Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587330›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2023

The impact of vascular volume fraction and compressibility of the interstitial matrix on vascularised poroelastic tissues.

Pietro Mascheroni, Raimondo Penta, José Merodio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pietro MascheroniLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, Université Grenoble Alpes, 140, Rue de la Physique, 38402, Saint Martin d'Héres, France.
Raimondo PentaSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Raimondo.Penta@glasgow.ac.uk.
José MerodioDepartamento de Matemática Aplicada a las TIC ETS de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030875/1HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 89398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we address the role of the microstructural properties of a vascularised poroelastic material, characterised by the coupling between a poroelastic matrix and a viscous fluid vessels network, on its overall response in terms of pressures, velocities and stress maps. We embrace the recently developed model (Penta and Merodio in Meccanica 52(14):3321-3343, 2017) as a theoretical starting point and present the results obtained by solving the full interplay between the microscale, represented by the intervessels' distance, and the macroscale, representing the size of the overall tissue. We encode the influence of the vessels' density and the poroelastic matrix compressibility in the poroelastic coefficients of the model, which are obtained by solving appropriate periodic cell problem at the microscale. The double-poroelastic model (Penta and Merodio 2017) is then solved at the macroscale in the context of vascular tumours, for different values of vessels' walls permeability. The results clearly indicate that improving the compressibility of the matrix and decreasing the vessels' density enhances the transvascular pressure difference and hence transport of fluid and drug within a tumour mass after a transient time. Our results suggest to combine vessel and interstitial normalization in tumours to allow for better drug delivery into the lesions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, BiologicalPorosityAsymptotic homogenizationMultiscale modellingPoroelasticityVascular tumours

Identifiers

PMID37587330
PMCPMC10613172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.