Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587328›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023

Cardiac metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: complementary role of SSTR PET/CT and cardiac MRI.

Evyn G Arnfield, Laura Tam, David A Pattison, John Younger, Venkata Avinash Chikatamarla, David Wyld, Matthew Burge, Louise McCormack, Rahul Ladwa, Stuart Ramsay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evyn G ArnfieldDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia. evyn.arnfield@gmail.com.
Laura TamFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
David A PattisonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
John YoungerFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Venkata Avinash ChikatamarlaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
David WyldFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Matthew BurgeFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Louise McCormackFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rahul LadwaFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Stuart RamsayDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are being detected with increasing frequency, although the optimal imaging strategy remains unclear. We performed a single-center retrospective study to explore the role of somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR PET/CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in NEN cardiac metastases, determine the degree of concordance between the findings of these imaging modalities, and examine the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. A secondary aim was to determine if cardiac metastases were associated with adverse cardiac events during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS AND

results19 patients with NEN cardiac metastases were identified. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed, and if available SSTR PET/CT and CMR were blindly re-reviewed by imaging specialists, documenting the number and location of cardiac metastases. All 19 patients had SSTR PET/CT, and 10/19 patients had CMR. SSTR PET/CT identified more metastases than CMR. When identified on CMR, metastases were more accurately localized. 12/19 patients received PRRT, with no cardiac adverse effects.

conclusionSSTR PET/CT and CMR are complementary investigations in the imaging of NEN cardiac metastases. SSTR PET/CT appears more sensitive for lesion detection, and CMR offers better lesion characterization. Both investigations present useful information for the planning of treatment including PRRT, which was administered safely.

Indexed as

Heart NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsThymus NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReceptors, SomatostatinRetrospective StudiesReceptors, Somatostatinhybrid imagingmolecular imagingMRIotherPET

Identifiers

PMID37587328
PMCPMC10682059
OpenAlexW4385856433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.