Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587326›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Spelling-to-pronunciation transparency ratings for the 20,000 most frequently written English words.

Ashley A Edwards, Valeria M Rigobon, Laura M Steacy, Donald L Compton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling Item-Level Spelling Variance in Adults: Providing Further Insights into Lexical Quality.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley A EdwardsFlorida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. aedwards@psy.fsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5268-4235
Valeria M RigobonFlorida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Laura M SteacyFlorida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Donald L ComptonFlorida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Funding

Experiential and child factors that determine acquisition of orthographic-phonological regularities in a quasi-regular writing system: An integrated behavioral/computational/neurobiological approachP20HD091013 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COMPTON, DONALD L · 2017 to 2025
$4.2M
Understanding the underlying relation between phonological clean-up ability and early word reading: A developmental explorationR21HD108771 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STEACY, LAURA · 2022 to 2023
$424k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P20HD091013Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21HD108771Institute of Education Sciences R324B190025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given English orthography's quasi-regular nature, applying common decoding rules to a word does not always result in a correct pronunciation matching the stored phonological form (e.g., the word tongue). To arrive at a correct pronunciation, developing readers must make the match between a decoded pronunciation and a word's correct pronunciation stored in memory. Developmentally, this matching process varies as a function of child skill (e.g., decoding, vocabulary) and word characteristics (e.g., spelling-to-pronunciation transparency, concreteness), with each being continuously distributed. Spelling-to-pronunciation transparency ratings represent a global measure of the ease of arriving at a word's correct pronunciation from its decoded pronunciation and in experimental studies has been shown to be a critical dimension in assessing the difficulty of a word for developing readers (e.g., Steacy et al., 2022a, 2022b). This study aimed to create a database of spelling-to-pronunciation transparency ratings for the 23,282 most frequently written English words, made available in the supplemental materials for future analyses. We asked adults to rate words' spelling-to-pronunciation transparency on a scale of 1-6 (1 = very easy to match, 6 = very difficult). Results of multiple regression analyses revealed variance in ratings to be unaccounted for by other word features, demonstrating the uniqueness of these ratings. Furthermore, words that are considered irregular, classified previously as strange, or contained at least one schwa received higher ratings, demonstrating strong associations between transparency and regularity. Lastly, these ratings significantly predicted both adult word naming time and child word reading accuracy above and beyond other word features known to predict reading.

Indexed as

PhoneticsReadingVocabularyAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansLanguageMalePsycholinguisticsWritingYoung AdultRegularitySet for variabilitySpelling-to-pronunciation transparencyWord ratings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.