Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587322›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023

Evaluation of quality of life in breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy using real-world data.

Shiao Li Oei, Anja Thronicke, Gerrit Grieb, Friedemann Schad, Jessica Groß

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiao Li OeiResearch Institut Havelhöhe gGmbH at, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089, Berlin, Germany. shiaoli.oei@havelhoehe.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-550X
Anja ThronickeResearch Institut Havelhöhe gGmbH at, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-8290
Gerrit GriebDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089, Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann SchadResearch Institut Havelhöhe gGmbH at, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-6209
Jessica GroßBreast Cancer Centre, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089, Berlin, Germany.
Forschungsinstitut Havelhöhe · DEGemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to advances in the fight against breast cancer, aesthetic aspects and the prevention of breast deformities are playing an important role in surgical procedures. Currently the main form of breast cancer surgery is breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and even if mastectomy (MAS) is required, oncoplastic surgery and reconstruction options can improve outcomes, including health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to assess whether surgery options induce different outcomes in self-reported QoL in guide-line treated breast cancer patients of the Network Oncology (NO).

methodsThis prospective Real-World-Data (RWD) study was conducted using data from the NO-clinical registry. QoL was assessed by evaluation of the European Organization of Research and Treatment Health-Related Quality of Life Core Questionnaire scale (EORTC QLQ-C30). Association factors between type of surgery options, without or with immediate breast reconstructions the EORTC QLQ-C30-scales at baseline after surgery, 6, 12, and 24 months later were analyzed with adjusted multivariate regression analysis, considering age, cancer stage, and treatment regimens, using software R.

resultsA total of 623 primary breast cancer patients (all tumor stages, median age 58 (ICR: 50-68) diagnosed and guide-line treated between 2013 and 2021), 524 BCS and 99 MAS, 24 of whom received immediate breast reconstruction (MBR), were eligible for analyses. Compared with BCS patients, MBR patients self-reported considerably lower global health, physical and social functioning, and higher burden of pain and financial difficulties at baseline. In later follow-up surveys, functional scales increased and symptoms decreased in all patients, and the differences between MAS and BCS equalized. Longitudinal analyses after 24 months were obtained from 258 patients and revealed that compared to 224 BCS, the 34 MAS patients reported increased social functioning (p = 0.04).

conclusionsAt 24 months after MAS, breast cancer patients' QoL improved compared with BCS, although impairments in QoL were reported immediately after MAS. A growing expertise in surgical procedures as well as supportive care is critical to optimizing patients' well-being. These findings may be considered when counseling breast cancer patients pre- and post-surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00013335 on 27/11/2017 retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomyFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeBreast-conserving surgeryHealth-related quality of lifeMastectomy with reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37587322
OpenAlexW4385879436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.