Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587208›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Efficacy and safety of inhaled heparin in asthmatic and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Rasha Ashmawy, Adel Zaki, Ayman Baess, Iman El Sayed

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in Immunity.Proteoglycan research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Treatment of lung diseasesMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rasha AshmawyDepartment of Clinical Research, Maamora Chest Hospital, MoHP, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-5968
Adel ZakiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-6568
Ayman BaessDepartment of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-8061
Iman El SayedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. Eman.abd.elftaah@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-958X
Alexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent chronic respiratory disorders that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Some studies evaluated the use of inhaled unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of asthma and COPD. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence for the efficacy and safety of inhaled heparin in improving lung functions among asthmatic and COPD patients. A comprehensive search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO Clinical trials, clinicaltrials.gov, Iranian Clinical trials, Google Scholar, Research Gate, ProQuest Thesis, OVID, and medRxiv databases. Two independent reviewers included all pertinent articles according to PRISMA guidelines, and extract data independently. The two reviewers checked the quality of studies using the ROB2 tool. To determine the pooled effect estimate of the efficacy and safety of inhaled heparin, a meta-analysis was carried out using the R programming language. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's regression test. The heterogeneity was explained using a meta-regression, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Twenty-six studies with a total of 581 patients were included in the qualitative analysis and 16 in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was treatment success (improvement of lung function) that was measured by standardized mean differences (SMD) of the forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1) either per ml or percentage. Heparin has a large effect on both FEV1% and FEV1 ml when compared to the control group (SMD 2.7, 95% CI 1.00; 4.39; GRADE high, SMD 2.12, 95% CI - 1.49; 5.72: GRADE moderate, respectively). Secondary outcomes are other lung functions improving parameters such as PC20 (SMD 0.91, 95% CI - 0.15; 1.96). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis show that heparin type, dose, year of publication, study design, and quality of studies had a substantial effect. Regarding safety, inhaled heparin showed a good coagulation profile and mild tolerable side effects. Inhaled heparin showed improvement in lung functions either alone or when added to standard care. More large parallel RCTs are needed including COPD patients, children, and other types, and stages of asthmatic patients.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChildDatabases, FactualHeparinHumansIranHeparin

Identifiers

PMID37587208
PMCPMC10432425
OpenAlexW4385873948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.