Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A comparison of the infant gut microbiome before versus after the start of the covid-19 pandemic.

Francesca R Querdasi, Sarah C Vogel, Moriah E Thomason, Bridget L Callaghan, Natalie H Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesca R Querdasi *University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Sarah C Vogel *New York University, New York, USA. scv267@nyu.edu.
Moriah E ThomasonNew York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Bridget L CallaghanUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Natalie H BritoNew York University, New York, USA.

Funding

8/24 The Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055338 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Obianuju Berry, Lauren Christine Shuffrey · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
PREVENTION RESEARCH TRAINING:URBAN CHILDREN'S MENT HLTHT32MH015750 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHRISTINE DUNKEL SCHETTER · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
Examining Prenatal Inflammation and Neurodevelopment in a Longitudinal Fetal-to-Age 9 Imaging Study - Administrative SupplementR01MH122447 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI THOMASON, MORIAH E, TRENTACOSTA, CHRISTOPHER J · 2020 to 2025
$3.9M
“Overlapping and Discrete Pathways Through Which Prenatal Isolation and Uncertainty Stress Impact Maternal Mental Health and Child NeurodevelopmentR01MH126468 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2021 to 2024
$3.0M
Investigating neurobehavioral consequences of COVID-19 related stressors on maternal mental health and infant developmentR01MH125870 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
From the womb to the classroom: Linking perinatal micronutrients and toxicants to neural and behavioral development in utero and in childhoodR01ES032294 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTINEZ, MAURO, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
Contributions of SES and Bilingualism on Early Cognitive DevelopmentR00HD086255 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI · 2017 to 2019
$730k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD086255NICHD NIH HHS R00HD086255NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055338NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032294NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126468NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting public health directives led to many changes in families' social and material environments. Prior research suggests that these changes are likely to impact composition of the gut microbiome, particularly during early childhood when the gut microbiome is developing most rapidly. Importantly, disruption to the gut microbiome during this sensitive period can have potentially long-lasting impacts on health and development. In the current study, we compare gut microbiome composition among a socioeconomically and racially diverse group of 12-month old infants living in New York City who provided stool samples before the pandemic (N = 34) to a group who provided samples during the first 9-months of the pandemic (March-December 2020; N = 20). We found that infants sampled during the pandemic had lower alpha diversity of the microbiome, lower abundance of Pasteurellaceae and Haemophilus, and significantly different beta diversity based on unweighted Unifrac distance than infants sampled before the pandemic. Exploratory analyses suggest that gut microbiome changes due to the pandemic occurred relatively quickly after the start of the pandemic and were sustained. Our results provide evidence that pandemic-related environmental disruptions had an impact on community-level taxonomic diversity of the developing gut microbiome, as well as abundance of specific members of the gut bacterial community.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPandemics

Identifiers

PMID37587195
PMCPMC10432475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.