ArticleScientific reports2023
Nomogram for prognosis of elderly patients with cervical cancer who receive combined radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of the lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) combined with clinicopathological indicators for predicting outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study and nomogram development.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of IFI6 as a novel prognostic biomarker and its correlation with immune infiltration in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance of Nomogram and T-Score in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Chemoradiotherapy and Image-Guided Brachytherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nomogram predicting overall survival in hospitalized cervical cancer patients in Mato Grosso, Brazil.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Nomogram model for predicting the long-term prognosis of cervical cancer patients: a population-based study in Mato Grosso, Brazil.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model for cervical cancer based on dynamic hematological and clinical features.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Construction and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cause-specific survival in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy based on the SEER database.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of prognostic models for young cervical cancer patients: age stratification based on restricted cubic splines.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Construction of a nomogram for personalized prediction of lower limb lymphedema risk after cervical cancer surgery.BMC women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study identified prognostic factors to help guide the clinical treatment of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with cervical cancer who had undergone radiotherapy. A personalized model to predict 3- and 5-years survival was developed. A review was conducted of 367 elderly women with cervical cancer (staged II-III) who had undergone radiotherapy in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for survival analysis that considered age, hemoglobin, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, pathologic type, stage, pelvic lymph node metastasis status, and others. A nomogram was constructed to predict the survival rates. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4-118 months). The 3- (5-) years overall, progression-free, local recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were, respectively, 91.0% (84.4%), 92.3% (85.9%), 99.18% (99.01%), and 99.18% (97.82%). The following were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival: tumor size, pre-treatment hemoglobin, chemotherapy, and pelvic lymph node metastasis. The C-index of the line chart was 0.699 (95% CI 0.652-0.746). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for 3- and 5-years survival were 0.751 and 0.724. The nomogram was in good concordance with the actual survival rates. The independent prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy were: tumor size, pre-treatment hemoglobin, chemotherapy, and pelvic lymph node metastasis. The novel prognostic nomogram based on these factors showed good concordance with the actual survival rates and can be used to guide personalized clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.