ArticleCommunications medicine2023
Infant movement classification through pressure distribution analysis.
Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical Characteristics and Biomedical Applications of Flexible Pressure Sensor Matrices: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A machine learning study highlighting the challenges of fidgety movement recognition using vision and inertial sensors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Infant limb kinematics and muscle force variation during kicking is associated with clinical cerebral palsy risk measures.PloS one · 2026Article
- Neonatal pose estimation in the unaltered clinical environment with fusion of RGB, depth and IR images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A novel smart baby cradle system utilizing IoT sensors and machine learning for optimized parental care.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated detection of abnormal general movements from pressure and positional information in hospitalized infants.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Deep learning empowered sensor fusion boosts infant movement classification.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The General Movement Optimality Score-Revised (GMOS-R) with Socioeconomically Stratified Percentile Ranks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Using the center of pressure movement analysis in evaluating spontaneous movements in infants: a comparative study with general movements assessment.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Infant movement classification through pressure distribution analysis.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Mobile Solutions for Clinical Surveillance and Evaluation in Infancy-General Movement Apps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Building Blocks for Deep Phenotyping in Infancy: A Use Case Comparing Spontaneous Neuromotor Functions in Prader-Willi Syndrome and Cerebral Palsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAiming at objective early detection of neuromotor disorders such as cerebral palsy, we propose an innovative non-intrusive approach using a pressure sensing device to classify infant general movements. Here we differentiate typical general movement patterns of the "fidgety period" (fidgety movements) vs. the "pre-fidgety period" (writhing movements).
methodsParticipants (N = 45) were sampled from a typically-developing infant cohort. Multi-modal sensor data, including pressure data from a pressure sensing mat with 1024 sensors, were prospectively recorded for each infant in seven succeeding laboratory sessions in biweekly intervals from 4 to 16 weeks of post-term age. 1776 pressure data snippets, each 5 s long, from the two targeted age periods were taken for movement classification. Each snippet was pre-annotated based on corresponding synchronised video data by human assessors as either fidgety present or absent. Multiple neural network architectures were tested to distinguish the fidgety present vs. fidgety absent classes, including support vector machines, feed-forward networks, convolutional neural networks, and long short-term memory networks.
resultsHere we show that the convolution neural network achieved the highest average classification accuracy (81.4%). By comparing the pros and cons of other methods aiming at automated general movement assessment to the pressure sensing approach, we infer that the proposed approach has a high potential for clinical applications.
conclusionsWe conclude that the pressure sensing approach has great potential for efficient large-scale motion data acquisition and sharing. This will in return enable improvement of the approach that may prove scalable for daily clinical application for evaluating infant neuromotor functions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.