Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587165›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2023

Infant movement classification through pressure distribution analysis.

Tomas Kulvicius, Dajie Zhang, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Sven Bölte, Marc Kraft, Christa Einspieler, Luise Poustka, Florentin Wörgötter, Peter B Marschik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Tomas Kulvicius *Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. tomas.kulvicius@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-6418
Dajie Zhang *Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-7426
Karin Nielsen-SainesDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1742-5211
Sven BölteCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marc KraftDepartment of Medical Engineering, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christa EinspieleriDN - interdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience, Division of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Luise PoustkaChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Florentin WörgötterLeibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Peter B MarschikChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-0980
Medical University of Graz · ATMSB Medical School Berlin · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DECurtin University · AUUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Genetic evolution, pathogenesis and immune responses in mother to child transmission of ZIKVR01AI140718 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, GENHONG, JUNG, JAE U · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Infant Immunologic and Neurologic Development following Maternal Infection in Pregnancy during Recent EpidemicsR56AI172252 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JUNG, JAE U, NIELSEN, KARIN · 2023 to 2023
$370k
Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 811NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140718NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI172252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAiming at objective early detection of neuromotor disorders such as cerebral palsy, we propose an innovative non-intrusive approach using a pressure sensing device to classify infant general movements. Here we differentiate typical general movement patterns of the "fidgety period" (fidgety movements) vs. the "pre-fidgety period" (writhing movements).

methodsParticipants (N = 45) were sampled from a typically-developing infant cohort. Multi-modal sensor data, including pressure data from a pressure sensing mat with 1024 sensors, were prospectively recorded for each infant in seven succeeding laboratory sessions in biweekly intervals from 4 to 16 weeks of post-term age. 1776 pressure data snippets, each 5 s long, from the two targeted age periods were taken for movement classification. Each snippet was pre-annotated based on corresponding synchronised video data by human assessors as either fidgety present or absent. Multiple neural network architectures were tested to distinguish the fidgety present vs. fidgety absent classes, including support vector machines, feed-forward networks, convolutional neural networks, and long short-term memory networks.

resultsHere we show that the convolution neural network achieved the highest average classification accuracy (81.4%). By comparing the pros and cons of other methods aiming at automated general movement assessment to the pressure sensing approach, we infer that the proposed approach has a high potential for clinical applications.

conclusionsWe conclude that the pressure sensing approach has great potential for efficient large-scale motion data acquisition and sharing. This will in return enable improvement of the approach that may prove scalable for daily clinical application for evaluating infant neuromotor functions.

Identifiers

PMID37587165
PMCPMC10432534
OpenAlexW4385876734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.