Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Deep learning-based automated lesion segmentation on mouse stroke magnetic resonance images.

Jeehye An, Leo Wendt, Georg Wiese, Tom Herold, Norman Rzepka, Susanne Mueller, Stefan Paul Koch, Christian J Hoffmann, Christoph Harms, Philipp Boehm-Sturm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeehye An *Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Leo Wendt *Scalable Minds GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Georg WieseScalable Minds GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Tom HeroldScalable Minds GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Norman RzepkaScalable Minds GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Susanne MuellerDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Paul KochDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian J HoffmannDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph HarmsDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp Boehm-SturmDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. philipp.boehm-sturm@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for ischemic stroke lesion detection in mice. A challenge is that lesion segmentation often relies on manual tracing by trained experts, which is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to inter- and intra-rater variability. Here, we present a fully automated ischemic stroke lesion segmentation method for mouse T2-weighted MRI data. As an end-to-end deep learning approach, the automated lesion segmentation requires very little preprocessing and works directly on the raw MRI scans. We randomly split a large dataset of 382 MRI scans into a subset (n = 293) to train the automated lesion segmentation and a subset (n = 89) to evaluate its performance. We compared Dice coefficients and accuracy of lesion volume against manual segmentation, as well as its performance on an independent dataset from an open repository with different imaging characteristics. The automated lesion segmentation produced segmentation masks with a smooth, compact, and realistic appearance that are in high agreement with manual segmentation. We report dice scores higher than the agreement between two human raters reported in previous studies, highlighting the ability to remove individual human bias and standardize the process across research studies and centers.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIschemic StrokeLabor, ObstetricStrokeAnimalsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37587160
PMCPMC10432383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.