Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587119›Full record

ReviewNature communications2023

Extreme environments offer an unprecedented opportunity to understand microbial eukaryotic ecology, evolution, and genome biology.

Hannah B Rappaport, Angela M Oliverio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Subterranean salamanders lean into mechanical sense following vision loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Chasing genes at high-altitude.Experimental physiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah B RappaportDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-4579
Angela M OliverioDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. amoliver@syr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0261-0393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in extreme environments has substantially expanded our understanding of the ecology and evolution of life on Earth, but a major group of organisms has been largely overlooked: microbial eukaryotes (i.e., protists). In this Perspective, we summarize data from over 80 studies of protists in extreme environments and identify focal lineages that are of significant interest for further study, including clades within Echinamoebida, Heterolobosea, Radiolaria, Haptophyta, Oomycota, and Cryptophyta. We argue that extreme environments are prime sampling targets to fill gaps in the eukaryotic tree of life and to increase our understanding of the ecology, metabolism, genome architecture, and evolution of eukaryotic life.

Indexed as

Eukaryotic CellsHaptophytaCryptophytaEcologyExtreme Environments

Identifiers

PMID37587119
PMCPMC10432404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.