Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587105›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Crackling noise microscopy.

Cam-Phu Thi Nguyen, Peggy Schoenherr, Ekhard K H Salje, Jan Seidel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Crackling noise microscopy.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cam-Phu Thi Nguyen *School of Materials Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4692-6592
Peggy Schoenherr *School of Materials Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8879-4567
Ekhard K H SaljeDepartment of Earth Sciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. es10002@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-6154
Jan SeidelSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. jan.seidel@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-3241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crackling noise is a scale-invariant phenomenon found in various driven nonlinear dynamical material systems as a response to external stimuli such as force or external fields. Jerky material movements in the form of avalanches can span many orders of magnitude in size and follow universal scaling rules described by power laws. The concept was originally studied as Barkhausen noise in magnetic materials and now is used in diverse fields from earthquake research and building materials monitoring to fundamental research involving phase transitions and neural networks. Here, we demonstrate a method for nanoscale crackling noise measurements based on AFM nanoindentation, where the AFM probe can be used to study the crackling of individual nanoscale features, a technique we call crackling noise microscopy. The method is successfully applied to investigate the crackling of individual topological defects, i.e. ferroelectric domain walls. We show that critical exponents for avalanches are altered at these nanoscale features, leading to a suppression of mixed-criticality, which is otherwise present in domains. The presented concept opens the possibility of investigating the crackling of individual nanoscale features in a wide range of material systems.

Identifiers

PMID37587105
PMCPMC10432464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.