Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587084›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

The added value of text from Dutch general practitioner notes in predictive modeling.

Tom M Seinen, Jan A Kors, Erik M van Mulligen, Egill Fridgeirsson, Peter R Rijnbeek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom M SeinenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5369-8260
Jan A KorsDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik M van MulligenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Egill FridgeirssonDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter R RijnbeekDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

European Health Data & Evidence NetworkEuropean Union's Horizon 2020Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking 806968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis work aims to explore the value of Dutch unstructured data, in combination with structured data, for the development of prognostic prediction models in a general practitioner (GP) setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe trained and validated prediction models for 4 common clinical prediction problems using various sparse text representations, common prediction algorithms, and observational GP electronic health record (EHR) data. We trained and validated 84 models internally and externally on data from different EHR systems.

resultsOn average, over all the different text representations and prediction algorithms, models only using text data performed better or similar to models using structured data alone in 2 prediction tasks. Additionally, in these 2 tasks, the combination of structured and text data outperformed models using structured or text data alone. No large performance differences were found between the different text representations and prediction algorithms. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that the use of unstructured data alone can result in well-performing prediction models for some clinical prediction problems. Furthermore, the performance improvement achieved by combining structured and text data highlights the added value. Additionally, we demonstrate the significance of clinical natural language processing research in languages other than English and the possibility of validating text-based prediction models across various EHR systems.

conclusionOur study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating unstructured data in clinical prediction models in a GP setting. Although the added value of unstructured data may vary depending on the specific prediction task, our findings suggest that it has the potential to enhance patient care.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHumansLanguageNatural Language ProcessingSoftwareclinical prediction modelelectronic health recordsmachine learningnatural language processingprognostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID37587084
PMCPMC10654855
OpenAlexW4385852262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.