Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37586731›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023

Cancer mortality after low dose exposure to ionising radiation in workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS): cohort study.

David B Richardson, Klervi Leuraud, Dominique Laurier, Michael Gillies, Richard Haylock, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Stephen Bertke, Robert D Daniels, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Monika Moissonnier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Diallyl disulfide reduces oxidative stress to mitigate uranium tailings radiation-induced damage to the hematopoietic system.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Radiation Exposure During Contrast-Enhanced Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies in Dogs and Cats.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David B RichardsonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA david.richardson@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-0212
Klervi LeuraudInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Dominique LaurierInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Michael GilliesUK Health Security Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK.
Richard HaylockUK Health Security Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK.
Kaitlin Kelly-ReifNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Stephen BertkeNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Robert D DanielsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Isabelle Thierry-ChefBarcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Monika MoissonnierInternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, France.
Ausrele KesminieneInternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, France.
Mary K Schubauer-BeriganInternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, France.

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Low-Dose Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Adulthood and Subsequent CancerR01CA242852 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID B RICHARDSON · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242852NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of protracted low dose, low dose rate exposure to ionising radiation on the risk of cancer.

designMultinational cohort study.

settingCohorts of workers in the nuclear industry in France, the UK, and the US included in a major update to the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).

participants309 932 workers with individual monitoring data for external exposure to ionising radiation and a total follow-up of 10.7 million person years.

main outcome measuresEstimates of excess relative rate per gray (Gy) of radiation dose for mortality from cancer.

resultsThe study included 103 553 deaths, of which 28 089 were due to solid cancers. The estimated rate of mortality due to solid cancer increased with cumulative dose by 52% (90% confidence interval 27% to 77%) per Gy, lagged by 10 years. Restricting the analysis to the low cumulative dose range (0-100 mGy) approximately doubled the estimate of association (and increased the width of its confidence interval), as did restricting the analysis to workers hired in the more recent years of operations when estimates of occupational external penetrating radiation dose were recorded more accurately. Exclusion of deaths from lung cancer and pleural cancer had a modest effect on the estimated magnitude of association, providing indirect evidence that the association was not substantially confounded by smoking or occupational exposure to asbestos.

conclusionsThis major update to INWORKS provides a direct estimate of the association between protracted low dose exposure to ionising radiation and solid cancer mortality based on some of the world's most informative cohorts of radiation workers. The summary estimate of excess relative rate solid cancer mortality per Gy is larger than estimates currently informing radiation protection, and some evidence suggests a steeper slope for the dose-response association in the low dose range than over the full dose range. These results can help to strengthen radiation protection, especially for low dose exposures that are of primary interest in contemporary medical, occupational, and environmental settings.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadiation ExposureCohort StudiesHumansIndustryRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37586731
PMCPMC10427997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.