Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37586643›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of biochemistry & cell biology2023

Using single molecule imaging to explore intracellular heterogeneity.

James A Galbraith, Catherine G Galbraith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James A GalbraithOregon Health and Science University, Quantitative and Systems Biology Program in BME and The Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: galbrjam@ohsu.edu.
Catherine G GalbraithOregon Health and Science University, Quantitative and Systems Biology Program in BME and The Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: galbrcat@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Cell MigrationR01GM117188 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GALBRAITH, CATHERINE GREEN · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite more than 100 years of study, it is unclear if the movement of proteins inside the cell is best described as a mosh pit or an exquisitely choreographed dance. Recent studies suggest the latter. Local interactions induce molecular condensates such as liquid-liquid phase separations (LLPSs) or non-liquid, functionally significant molecular aggregates, including synaptic densities, nucleoli, and Amyloid fibrils. Molecular condensates trigger intracellular signaling and drive processes ranging from gene expression to cell division. However, the descriptions of condensates tend to be qualitative and correlative. Here, we indicate how single-molecule imaging and analyses can be applied to quantify condensates. We discuss the pros and cons of different techniques for measuring differences between transient molecular behaviors inside and outside condensates. Finally, we offer suggestions for how imaging and analyses from different time and space regimes can be combined to identify molecular behaviors indicative of condensates within the dynamic high-density intracellular environment.

Indexed as

ProteinsSingle Molecule ImagingCell NucleolusDiagnostic ImagingProteinsBiomolecular condensatesLiquid-liquid phase separations (LLPS)Molecular aggregatesSingle-molecule super-resolutionSingle-molecule trackingSpace-time trade-off

Identifiers

PMID37586643
PMCPMC10528986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.