Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37585947›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2023

Studies on the Child Handbook in Brazil: a scoping review.

Juliana Araujo Teixeira, Cintia de Freitas Oliveira, Maritsa Carla de Bortoli, Sonia Isoyama Venâncio

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliana Araujo TeixeiraInsper. Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisa Aplicada à Primeira Infância. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-1362
Cintia de Freitas OliveiraSecretaria de Estado da Saúde. Instituto de Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-6510
Maritsa Carla de BortoliSecretaria de Estado da Saúde. Instituto de Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-7233
Sonia Isoyama VenâncioInsper. Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisa Aplicada à Primeira Infância. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-3292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically identify and map studies involving the Caderneta da Criança (Child Handbook - CH) in Brazil.

methodsA scoping review using the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The databases PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações, Periódicos Capes and Google Scholar were consulted. Primary and secondary studies that mentioned the use of CH were included, without restrictions regarding design, year of publication or population, published in Portuguese, English or Spanish and gray literature (theses and dissertations).

resultsA total of 129 studies were included, mostly descriptive, published as scientific papers. The Northeast region, the population of caregivers of children and the Primary Care scenario were observed in most studies; 47% of the studies used the CH as a source of data, the majority on vaccination. Despite the different criteria to define adequacy of completing the CH, the studies identified weaknesses in filling out all of its items, except for immunization. The utilization and/or completion of the CH were linked to various factors, including the availability of the CH, characteristics of the children (such as sex, age, prematurity and well-child appointments), attributes of the family members and caregivers (such as age, education, income, parity, work status, prenatal care, reading, note-taking and bringing CH to appointments) and features of the professionals (such as workplace, medical specialty, communication style, knowledge about the CH, requesting, guiding and note-taking).

conclusionsThe results reinforce the need to better understand which factors affect the distribution of the CH in the population, as well as pointing to the need for understanding its use and completion by the different care points. The need for intervention studies to improve the implementation of this tool and to include training on the use of the CH in the context of continuing health education becomes evident.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth EducationBrazilFamilyFemaleHumansPregnancyWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID37585947
PMCPMC10392774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.