Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37585918›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2023

Comparison of the timed inspiratory effort index with the T-piece trial as a decision-making tool for extubation: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

M D P Godoy, L C de Souza, A E da Silva Neto, J R Lugon

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M D P GodoyPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-6734
L C de SouzaServiço de Fisioterapia, Hospital Icaraí, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, Universidade Estácio de Sá, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-7620
A E da Silva NetoHospital Icaraí, Fisioterapia, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-9917
J R LugonDepartamento de Medicina/Nefrologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-3910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "timed inspiratory effort" (TIE) index, a new predictor of weaning outcome, normalizes the maximal inspiratory pressure with the time required to reach this value up to 60 s, incorporating the time domain into the assessment of inspiratory muscle function. The objective of this study was to determine whether the TIE predicts successful extubation at a similar rate as the T-piece trial with less time required. A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was performed with ICU subjects eligible for weaning. The participants were allocated to the TIE or the T-piece groups. The primary outcome was successful weaning, and the main secondary outcome was ICU mortality. Eighty participants of each group were included in the final analysis. Time from the start of a successful test to effective extubation was significantly lower in the TIE group than in the T-piece group, 15 (10 to 24) vs 55 (40 to 75) min, P<0.001. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, no significant differences were found in successful weaning (79.5 vs 82.5%, P=0.268) or survival rate (62.9 vs 53.8%, P=0.210) between the TIE and T-piece groups at the 30th day. In this preliminary study, the TIE index was not inferior to the T-piece trial as a decision-making tool for extubation and allowed a reduction in the decision time.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationVentilator WeaningHumansRespiration, ArtificialTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID37585918
PMCPMC10427157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.