Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37585888›Full record

SynthesisEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2023

The effects of gratitude interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Geyze Diniz, Ligia Korkes, Luca Schiliró Tristão, Rosangela Pelegrini, Patrícia Lacerda Bellodi, Wanderley Marques Bernardo

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Can Gratitude Ease the Burden of Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geyze DinizPlenae, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-1024
Ligia KorkesPlenae, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2405-8285
Luca Schiliró TristãoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Santos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-0915
Rosangela PelegriniPsychologist, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-4338
Patrícia Lacerda BellodiFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-6930
Wanderley Marques BernardoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-5207
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCiena (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGratitude has several implications. Over time, a logical relationship has been established between gratitude and well-being. In addition, researchers aimed to establish associations between gratitude and other factors of positive feelings using scientific methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to develop gratitude and its benefits to human beings.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate and quantify the available scientific evidence on interventions to acquire knowledge on gratitude as a quantifiable causal factor of benefit to human beings.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that investigated the effects of gratitude interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Central Cochrane databases were searched in addition to gray (Google Scholar) and manual search. Two authors independently evaluated the titles and abstracts, and selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria. The searches were conducted between January and July 2022.

resultsSixty-four randomized clinical trials were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that patients who underwent gratitude interventions experienced greater feelings of gratitude, better mental health, and fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression. Moreover, they experienced other benefits such as a more positive mood and emotions.

conclusionThe results demonstrate that acts of gratitude can be used as a therapeutic complement for treating anxiety and depression and can increase positive feelings and emotions in the general population. Prospero database registration: (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) under the number CRD42021250799.

Indexed as

AnxietyMental HealthHumans

Identifiers

PMID37585888
PMCPMC10393216
OpenAlexW4385468057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.