Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37585444›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Post-operative outcomes in Indigenous patients in North America and Oceania: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rachel J Livergant, Kelsey Stefanyk, Catherine Binda, Georgia Fraulin, Sasha Maleki, Sarah Sibbeston, Shahrzad Joharifard, Tracey Hillier, Emilie Joos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel J LivergantFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-6412
Kelsey StefanykFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6494-7637
Catherine BindaFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Terrace, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-3327
Georgia FraulinFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-093X
Sasha MalekiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9711-7226
Sarah SibbestonFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7725-7478
Shahrzad JoharifardDepartment of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-8758
Tracey HillierMi'kmaq Qalipu First Nation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-7720
Emilie JoosDivision of General Surgery, Branch for Global Surgical Care, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7081-796X
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples across North America and Oceania experience worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous people, including increased post-operative mortality. Several gaps in data exist regarding global differences in surgical morbidity and mortality for Indigenous populations based on geographic locations and across surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to evaluate disparities in post-operative outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched with no language restriction. Studies reporting on Indigenous populations outside of Canada, the USA, New Zealand, or Australia, or on interventional procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes were post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations, readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Eighty-four unique observational studies were included in this review. Of these, 67 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Oceania n = 31, North America n = 36). Extensive heterogeneity existed among studies and 50% were of poor quality. Indigenous patients had 1.26 times odds of post-operative morbidity (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10-1.44, p<0.01) and 1.34 times odds of post-operative infection (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59, p<0.01) than non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous patients also had 1.33 times odds of reoperation (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.74, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found that Indigenous patients in North American and Oceania experience significantly poorer surgical outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally, there is a low proportion of high-quality research focusing on assessing surgical equity for Indigenous patients in these regions, despite multiple international and national calls to action for reconciliation and decolonization to improve quality surgical care for Indigenous populations.

Identifiers

PMID37585444
PMCPMC10431673
OpenAlexW4385858399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.