Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584978›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.

Fernando Bussiman, Ching-Yi Chen, Justin Holl, Matias Bermann, Andres Legarra, Ignacy Misztal, Daniela Lourenco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fernando BussimanDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-5816
Ching-Yi ChenGenus PIC, Hendersonville, TN 37075, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-8313
Justin HollGenus PIC, Hendersonville, TN 37075, USA.
Matias BermannDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-0710
Andres LegarraINRA, UMR1388 GenPhySE, Castanet-Tolosan 31326, France.
Ignacy MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-1897
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

Pig Improvement Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical data collection for genetic evaluation purposes is a common practice in animal populations; however, the larger the dataset, the higher the computing power needed to perform the analyses. Also, fitting the same model to historical and recent data may be inappropriate. Data truncation can reduce the number of equations to solve, consequently decreasing computing costs; however, the large volume of genotypes is responsible for most of the increase in computations. This study aimed to assess the impact of removing genotypes along with phenotypes and pedigree on the computing performance, reliability, and inflation of genomic predicted breeding value (GEBV) from single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for selection candidates. Data from two pig lines, a terminal sire (L1) and a maternal line (L2), were analyzed in this study. Four analyses were implemented: growth and "weaning to finish" mortality on L1, pre-weaning and reproductive traits on L2. Four genotype removal scenarios were proposed: removing genotyped animals without phenotypes and progeny (noInfo), removing genotyped animals based on birth year (Age), the combination of noInfo and Age scenarios (noInfo + Age), and no genotype removal (AllGen). In all scenarios, phenotypes were removed, based on birth year, and three pedigree depths were tested: two and three generations traced back and using the entire pedigree. The full dataset contained 1,452,257 phenotypes for growth traits, 324,397 for weaning to finish mortality, 517,446 for pre-weaning traits, and 7,853,629 for reproductive traits in pure and crossbred pigs. Pedigree files for lines L1 and L2 comprised 3,601,369 and 11,240,865 animals, of which 168,734 and 170,121 were genotyped, respectively. In each truncation scenario, the linear regression method was used to assess the reliability and dispersion of GEBV for genotyped parents (born after 2019). The number of years of data that could be removed without harming reliability depended on the number of records, type of analyses (multitrait vs. single trait), the heritability of the trait, and data structure. All scenarios had similar reliabilities, except for noInfo, which performed better in the growth analysis. Based on the data used in this study, considering the last ten years of phenotypes, tracing three generations back in the pedigree, and removing genotyped animals not contributing own or progeny phenotypes, increases computing efficiency with no change in the ability to predict breeding values.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticAnimalsPedigreePhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsSwinedata truncationgenomic selectionold genotypespedigree depthsingle-step

Identifiers

PMID37584978
PMCPMC10464514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.