Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584887›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2024

Educational Approaches Using Simulation for Psychiatric Risk Assessment: a Scoping Review.

Daamoon Ghahari, Danica Chaharlangi, Sarah Bonato, Stephanie Sliekers, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Amina Ali, Paul Benassi

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daamoon GhahariUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Daamoon.ghahari@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-2029
Danica ChaharlangiUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sarah BonatoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephanie SliekersCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sanjeev SockalingamUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amina AliUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul BenassiUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe ability to assess a patient's risk of harm to self or others is a core competency for mental health clinicians which can have significant patient outcomes. With the growth of simulation in medical education, there is an opportunity to enhance education outcomes for psychiatric risk assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine how simulation is used to build competency in risk assessment and map its educational outcomes.

methodsThe authors conducted a systematic scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Electronic database searches were conducted by an academic librarian. Studies published before August 2022 which described simulation activities aimed at training clinicians in suicide, self-harm, and/or violence risk assessment were screened for eligibility.

resultsOf the 21,814 articles identified, 58 studies were selected for inclusion. The majority described simulations teaching suicide risk assessment, and there was a notable gap for building competency in violence risk assessment. Simulation utility was demonstrated across emergency, inpatient, and outpatient settings involving adult and pediatric care. The most common simulation modality was patient actors. A smaller subset implemented technological approaches, such as automated virtual patient avatars. Outcomes included high learner satisfaction, and increases in psychiatric risk assessment knowledge, competency, and performance.

conclusionSimulation as an adjuvant to existing medical curricula can be used to teach risk assessment in mental health. Based on the results of our review, the authors provide recommendations for medical educators looking to design and implement simulation in mental health education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalSuicideAdultChildComputer SimulationCurriculumHumansMedical educationSelf-harm risk assessmentSimulationSuicide risk assessmentViolence risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37584887
OpenAlexW4385851157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.