Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584839›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2023

"Green informed consent" in the classroom, clinic, and consultation room.

Cristina Richie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ecological preferences and patient autonomy.Journal of medical ethics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Patients' Attitudes Towards Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Healthcare Decision-Making: An Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient autonomy in the era of the sustainability crisis.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Cristina RichieEthics of Technology, Edinburgh Futures Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. cristina.richie@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7885-9136
Institute for Futures Studies · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carbon emissions of global health care activities make up 4-5% of total world emissions, placing it on par with the food sector. Carbon emissions are particularly relevant for health care because of climate change health hazards. Doctors and health care professionals must connect their health care delivery with carbon emissions and minimize resource use when possible as a part of their obligation to do no harm. Given that reducing carbon is a global ethical priority, the informed consent process in health care delivery must change. I argue that the expanded role of bioethicists in this climate crisis is to promote and support "green informed consent:" the sharing of climate information with patients, offering options for lower-carbon health care, and accepting the patient's right to decline treatments which are deemed too carbon intensive for their values.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPatient RightsCarbonDelivery of Health CareHumansReferral and ConsultationCarbonEnvironmental bioethicsGreen informed consentHealth care ethicsMedical educationProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID37584839
PMCPMC10725850
OpenAlexW4385851767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.