ArticleNeurogenetics2023
Clinical and functional study of two de novo variations of CDKL5 gene.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase like 5 (CDKL5) gene variation is X-linked dominant and is associated with type 2 developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Although numerous cases of CDKL5 have been reported, there is limited discussion regarding functional verification. We described two children with DEE caused by de novo variations of CDKL5 gene, analyzed their clinical manifestations, and performed genetic testing on their gene variation sites. The two cases presented with tonic seizures followed by epileptic spasms, indicative of refractory epilepsy. Physical examination revealed abnormal facial features, including wide eye distance, low nose base, and high nose bridge. Both cases exhibited developmental disabilities. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed widening of the bilateral frontotemporal extracerebral space. Genetic testing identified variations at the gene sites c.463 + 4A > G (splicing) and c.1854_1861delCAAAGTGA (p.D618Efs*18). Minigene experiments further confirmed that the intronic variation c.463 + 4A > G (splicing) disrupted splicing, leading to protein truncation. CDKL5 gene variation can lead to DEE, and intron variation site c.463 + 4A > G (splicing) can cause protein truncation, which is a pathogenic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37584787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.