Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584717›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Dual-tracer PET/CT protocol with [

Simone Wegen, Jasmin Weindler, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Lutz van Heek, Klaus Schomäcker, Thomas Fischer, Simone Marnitz, Carsten Kobe, Alexander Drzezga, Katrin S Roth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Same-day dual-tracer PET/CT imaging with [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Trial
  3. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Total Body PET.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of [EJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone WegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jasmin WeindlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Conrad-Amadeus VoltinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lutz van HeekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Klaus SchomäckerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas FischerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Simone MarnitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Carsten KobeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander DrzezgaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Katrin S RothDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. katrin.roth@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-2777
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFibroblast activation protein (FAP) detected by positron-emission tomography (PET) using fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) appears to be a promising target for cancer imaging, staging, and therapy, providing added value and strength as a complement to [

methodsA total of 19 patients with head and neck and gastrointestinal cancers received initial [

resultsThe diagnostic performance of dual-tracer compared to single-tracer PET/CT was equal in 13 patients and superior in 6 patients. The mean TBRs of tumors and metastases in dual-tracer PET/CTs were mostly higher compared to single-tracer PET/CT using maximal count rates (CRmax). GTV and FTV were significantly larger when measured on dual-tracer compared to single-tracer PET/CT.

conclusionDual-tracer PET/CT with [

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyQuinolinesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesHumansTumor BurdenFAPI-46Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesQuinolinesDual-tracer PET/CTFAPIFDGFunctional tissue volumeGross tumor volume

Identifiers

PMID37584717
PMCPMC10784364
OpenAlexW4385850944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.